Legal Opinion

People v. Buckley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 16, 1993No. 93SA10PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline case the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct providing for the imposition of either a private or public censure. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the stipulation, and a majority of the panel recommended the imposition of a private censure. We accept the stipulation, but conclude that public censure constitutes the appropriate sanction under all of the circumstances.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on October 1,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. SennSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. White v. AndrewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. People v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GrolandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. People v. RitlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  4. People v. FreemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. FloresSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API