Legal Opinion

People v. Groland

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 28, 1995No. 95SA350PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, and recommended that the respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding be suspended for one year and one day. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1990, and was licensed to practice law in Florida in 1971. The assistant disciplinary counsel and the respondent stipulated to the following facts and disciplinary violations.

A

In March 1993, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. LarsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. SharpeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. JanousekNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. BluntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DISC. v. JanousekNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API