Legal Opinion
Michigan State Industries v. Fischer Hardware Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 7, 1934No. 619PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, J.
It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that the appointment of the receiver was made by the Court of Common Pleas without jurisdiction, and that the order is, therefore, void, and can be now collaterally attacked, that the plaintiff in error is entitled to levy execution upon the assets of the corporation. A number of interesting propositions of law are presented by this contention.
Without in detail taking up the several paragraphs of §11894, GC, it is obvious that there was no ground for the appointment of the receiver under the provisions of this section, the only…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Shields v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. WeigleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Grant v. A. B. Leach & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jamestown Village Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Market Media Research, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Olive Branch Holdings, L.L.C. v. Smith Technology Development, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009