Vincent v. Voight
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 158. (concurring in part; dissenting in part). The principal issue in this case is stated by the petitioners: "Does the Wisconsin school finance system violate the Uniformity Provision of the Education Article, article X, § 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution?" A majority of the court holds that it does not. Three justices, however, would rule otherwise. Moreover, these three justices and Justice Crooks interpret art. X, § 3 in a manner that encourages future litigation and will plunge the judiciary into the legislature's domain.
¶ 159. I join the concurring opinion of Justice Sykes not because…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buse v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Zilisch v. AuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- American Asylum at Hartford v. President of the Phoenix BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
- Thompson v. Kenosha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Maxcy v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.