Legal Opinion

Warner Sugar Refining Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 21, 1926No. Docket No. 2108PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Upon the evidence held, that the assessment by the Commissioner on March 31, 1924, of a deficiency in respect of the tax for the calendar year 1917 was not barred by the statute of limitations.

1Opinion of the Court

*9OPINION.

Littleton:

This appeal does not contest the correctness of the net taxable income, nor does it allege that the Commissioner committed an error in his determination of the deficiency for the year 1917, but alleges that the Commissioner was without legal authority in March, 1924, to assess or collect the deficiency of $110,583.55. The Commissioner moves to dismiss the appeal upon th*e ground that the Board is without jurisdiction to determine the issue raised.

The Board has jurisdiction to decide the question of whether the assessment was barred by the statute of limitations. Appeal of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shutte v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Girard Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Randon v. TobySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. State Loan & Trust Co. v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berry v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  2. Simmons v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  3. Negroni Vda. de Lluberas v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  4. Eugene Fruit Growers Asso. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
  5. Negroni v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API