Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Howard

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1947No. 32208PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action at law brought by the plaintiff to recover damages to his automobile and to his person, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant when plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s truck collided.

The plaintiff’s petition sets forth several charges of negligence against the defendant which he claims constitute the direct and proximate cause of the accident and the resulting damages to his automobile and person. The defendant’s answer denies the affirmative allegations of the plaintiff’s petition, and alleges that any damage to the plaintiff’s automobile or to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bergendahl v. RabelerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McCulley v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Roberts v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Grantham v. Watson Bros. TransportationNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Schrage v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fimple v. Archer Ballroom Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bell v. CrookNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Mundy v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Umberger v. SankeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API