Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Riley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2014No. Nos. 40595-2012, 40599-2013PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND AMENDED OPINION

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED AUGUST 25, 2014 IS HEREBY AMENDED.

EISMANN, Justice.

This is a permissive appeal out of Ada County from an order denying the appellants’ motions for summary judgment. The central issue is whether an attorney who, as counsel for a corporation, issues an opinion letter stating that a stock redemption agreement does not violate the law can be held liable to the shareholder whose stock was redeemed if the opinion was incorrect and the redemption agreement was later declared void as violating state law. We hold that the claim against appellant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. City of McCall v. BuxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Budget Truck Sales, LLC v. TilleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Carter v. Gateway Parks LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Taylor v. RileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Schriver v. RaptoshIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API