Legal Opinion
DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE HAMPDEN DISTRICT v. Grucci
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 29, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The district attorney for the Hampden District filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment concerning the duties and obligations of the defendant in relation to the conflict of interest law (G. L. c. 268A). A judge of the Superi- or Court reported the case to the Appeals Court on the parties’ agreement as to “the material facts.” We granted the plain tiff’s request for direct appellate review. We conclude that declaratory relief is not appropriate in this case.
The defendant was one of three members of the West Springfield board of selectmen at the time the complaint was filed and at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Department of Community Affairs v. Massachusetts State College Building AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Bunker Hill Distributing, Inc. v. District AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Board of Selectmen v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Board of Selectmen of Avon v. LinderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Saccone v. State Ethics CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Iodice v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Sciuto v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Alliance, AFSCME/SEIU, AFL-CIO v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.