Legal Opinion

Alliance, AFSCME/SEIU, AFL-CIO v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 23, 1997PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

The plaintiffs, who represent certain State employees, seek a declaratory judgment that the Governor’s disapproval of a clause requiring not less than thirty-nine full-time equivalent (FTE) positions as part of a budget item providing funding for early intervention services to certain children under the age of three and their families is an invalid exercise of the Governor’s authority. The case is remanded to the single justice to enter an order dismissing the action for lack of jurisdiction.

*535I

In 1995 the Legislature enacted a bill, 1995 House No. 5100, containing the budget for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Secretary of Administration & Finance v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Auditor of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Alliance, AFSCME/SEIU, AFL-CIO v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. State Police for Automatic Retirement Ass'n v. DifavaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  4. Machado v. LeahyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  5. Wells Fargo Fin. Mass., Inc. v. MulveyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API