Legal Opinion
Alston v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 2, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1397 (RMU)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s . Motion to Vacate the August 20, 2009 Order Granting the Plaintiff Leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to vacate the court’s August 20, 2009 order, which granted the pro se plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). As elaborated below, the court determines that the plaintiff has on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated, brought an action in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pettus v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Thompson v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Ibrahim v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Butler v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McFadden v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Matthews v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Sussman v. United States Marshals ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McCoy v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Demario Walker v. Bryan A. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.