Legal Opinion
Morrison & Foerster, LLP v. Wick
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 19, 2000No. CIV.A.00-B-465PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW & ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
In this Internet action brought, inter alia, pursuant to the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) (“ACPA”), Morrison & Foerster moves for a preliminary and permanent injunction. Defendants, Brian Wick and American Distribution Systems, Inc. (“ADSI”), oppose this motion. The issues are fully briefed. The parties stipulated to consolidation of the preliminary injunction hearing with a trial on the merits, and oral arguments were heard on March 30, 2000. For the reasons set forth below, I grant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church and State v. The City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Hormel Foods Corporation v. Jim Henson Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. DoughneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Gibson v. Texas Department of Insurance-Division of Workers' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Mayflower Transit, LLC v. PrinceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. Spider Webs Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- CrossFit, Inc. v. JenkinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.