Legal Opinion
E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. Spider Webs Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 29, 2001No. CIV. A. H-00-450PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the court is Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery’s (“Gallo”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (# 32). Gallo contends that there exist no issues of material fact on its claims that Defendants Spider Webs Ltd., Steve E. Thumann, Pierce A. Thumann, and Fred H. Thu-mann, Trustee, (collectively “Spider Webs”) are jointly and severally liable for violations of the Texas Anti-Dilution Statute, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. § 16.29 (Vernon 2000), and the federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”), 15…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Joseph C. Shields v. John ZuccariniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Bosley Medical Institute, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Bosley Medical Group, S.C., an Illinois Corporation v. Michael Steven KremerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Horseshoe Bay Resort Sales Co. v. Lake Lyndon B. Johnson Improvement Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Express One International, Inc. v. Steinbeck, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- Daimlerchrysler v. The Net Inc., Keith Maydak Michael SussmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.