Legal Opinion
Mayflower Transit, LLC v. Prince
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 30, 2004No. Civ.A. 00-5354 (JLL)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
LINARES, District Judge.
Presently before this Court are the motions for partial summary judgment by both Defendant Brett Prince and Plaintiff Mayflower Transit, LLC (“Mayflower Transit”). 1 Plaintiff Mayflower Transit filed suit against Defendant Prince alleging violations of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) (“ACPA”), the Federal Dilution Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c), and asserting claims for libel and trade libel under state law. This motion is resolved without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Foundation for Apologetic Information & ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Avaya Inc. v. Telecom Labs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Arista Records, Inc. v. Flea World, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Buying for the Home, LLC v. Humble Abode, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Gioconda Law Group PLLC v. KenzieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.