Legal Opinion

Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1936No. 7,465PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

This is an action arising out of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Albert Miller, the claimant, appellant here, who will hereafter be referred to as the plaintiff, was injured while in the employ of the Love-Sinclair Service, Inc., a corporation conducting a garage and a service station at Billings. January 1, 1932, the claimant, who was the night man at the garage, while removing a casing from the rim of an automobile, dropped the heavy rim on his foot, which resulted in the injury upon which the claim is based. Dr. Farr, of Billings, was called to attend Miller and continued to treat him…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People ex rel. Johnson v. EarlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Evers v. HudsonMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Valley Bank v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gaffney v. Industrial Accident Board of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Yurkovich v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Yeomans v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. State ex rel. Morgan v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Carter v. Associated Petroleum CarriersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API