Legal Opinion

United States v. Monongahela Connecting Railroad Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1972No. Civ. A. 67-1112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

This case originated when the United States on September 18, 1967, filed a complaint seeking a penalty of $250 1 for movement by defendant of a twelve car train on August 3, 1967, with air brakes operational on only five cars. This was less than 85 per cent of the cars, and hence allegedly violated 45 U.S.C. §§ 1-10, and a regulation of the Federal Railroad Administration (49 C.F.R. 232.1). 2 It should be noted that 45 U.S.C. § 9 requires that not less than 50 per cent of the cars in a train have operational brakes, 3 but that the Secretary of Transportation 4…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Goesaert v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradford v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Schuler v. Federal Railroad Administration of United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Co-Operative Legislative Committee v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API