Schuler v. Federal Railroad Administration of United States Department of Transportation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendant Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) moves to dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is granted.
Plaintiff Raymond T. Schuler, Commissioner of Transportation of the State of New York (“Schuler”) challenges orders of the FRA issued in response to a block signal application filed by the Erie Lackawanna Railway Company (“Erie”). Schuler seeks to have these orders declared null and void and to enjoin their enforcement.
Attack upon the complaint is predicated upon the following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- The Elmo Division of Drive-X Company, Inc. v. Paul Rand Dixon, the Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Lodge's Lessee v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- United States v. Monongahela Connecting Railroad Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michael Cousins v. Secretary of the United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Ass'n of America, Inc. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cahill v. Fruehauf Corp. (In Re Associated Transport, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers v. SkinnerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
- Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Association Of America, Inc. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.