Legal Opinion
Lovelace v. Keohane
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 20, 1992No. 74848Published
1Opinion of the Court
831 P.2d 624 (1992)
Marian E. LOVELACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Father Daniel C. KEOHANE, Individually, and as Agent and Employee of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Tulsa; the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Tulsa, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74848.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
February 11, 1992.
Rehearing Dismissed April 20, 1992.
Glenn R. Beustring & Associates, Gregory P. Williams, Tulsa, for plaintiff-appellant.
Covington & Poe, James E. Poe and Stephen R. Clouser, Tulsa, for defendant-appellee, Father…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Cayman Exploration Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Armijo v. Ex Cam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.