Silk v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is a petition for the assessment of the damages arising out of the respondent’s taking in 1966 of some 172,000 square feet of land, together with two buildings thereon (“one a car wash building and the other a building used as a warehouse”), owned by the petitioners and located on Mystic Avenue and Shore Drive in Som-erville. The jury returned a verdict for the petitioners in the amount of $314,000, and the case is here on the petitioners’ *151exceptions to the exclusion of evidence offered by them and the admission of evidence offered by the respondent.
The principal dispute between the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newton Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Boston Gas Co. v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Tigar v. Mystic River Bridge AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Commonwealth v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Muzi v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Correia v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Sandwich Water DistrictMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Correia v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Investors Automotive Holding Co. v. DonovanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Silk v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973