Legal Opinion

New Hampshire Insurance v. Vieira

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1991No. 89-16291PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

New Hampshire Insurance Company (“New Hampshire”) sought reimbursement from Albert Vieira and Vieira Drywall (“Vieira”) for $300,000 it paid in settlement of a claim against Vieira. The district court found that the loss sustained — diminution of value — was not “property damage” covered under the applicable insurance contract, and granted summary judgment for New Hampshire. We affirm.

I

A general contractor hired Vieira to install drywall in the rooms and attics of three low-income housing projects. When the projects were completed, an investigation uncovered Vieira’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Albert VieiraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API