Legal Opinion
Crestar Bank, N.A. v. Cheevers
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 2000No. 97-CV-1584PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge.
The central issue presented in this case is whether, under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. (1994), a credit cardholder is required to avail himself of the billing dispute procedures of 15 U.S.C. § 1666 by notifying the creditor of disputed charges, in order to invoke the liability protections of 15 U.S.C. § 1643 against unauthorized charges to a credit card. Appellant Crestar Bank (“Crestar”) filed a civil action against ap-pellee Eric L. Cheevers alleging that Mr. Cheevers owed an outstanding credit card balance of $4,231.76, plus interest.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edward J. Minskoff Edward J. Minskoff Equities, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- American Express Co. v. KoernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oscar S. Gray v. American Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DBI Architects, P.C. v. American Express Travel-Related Services Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Geiger v. Crestar BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Danner v. Discover BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. MayoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Danner v. Discover BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015