Legal Opinion
Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. Mayo
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 2011No. 45,945-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
h Johnathan Mayo appeals a summary judgment ordering him to pay the balance on a Citibank (South Dakota) NA MasterCard account, $16,233.84, plus contractual interest of 29.99% and an attorney fee of 25%. For the reasons expressed, we amend and affirm.
Procedural History
Citibank’s petition alleged that Mayo agreed to the terms of the account agreement when he opened the account; he failed to pay despite amicable demand; and Citibank had previously sent him a demand letter that complied with La. R.S. 9:2781, entitling it to an attorney fee. Mayo answered, in proper person, that all Citibank’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Hill v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Row v. Pierremont Plaza, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Michigan National Bank v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Capital One, NA v. WaltersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Damrich v. DamrichCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014