In the Interest of D.R.L.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I.Introduction.
In this case, we decide two primary issues. We address the appropriate standard to be applied by the trial court in deciding whether to place half-sisters who have never lived together in the same adoptive home and whether the trial court’s refusal to place a child with the persons named in a mother’s voluntary affidavit of relinquishment affects the vol-untariness of the affidavit. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 162.302(e) (Vernon Supp. 2002).1
The trial court terminated the parental rights of D.R.L.M.’s biological parents. Two families 2, the Smiths, who…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- In the Interest of M.N.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- in the Interest of D.A.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- in the Interest of W.J.H., Jr., J.J.H., D.D.H., and D.N.H., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
- in the Interest of J.J.O., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.