Legal Opinion

Oregon Taxpayers United PAC v. Keisling

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 18, 1996No. 93C-13664; CA A90002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff is a political committee, organized to oppose what it regards as excessive taxation and to promote efficiency in state and local government. It initiated this action to obtain a declaration that certain statutes that require the disclosure of the identities of individuals who contribute to ballot measure campaigns are unconstitutional and also to obtain an injunction prohibiting defendant Secretary of State Phil Keisling from disclosing the names of plaintiffs members who contribute to measures it may support in the future. Plaintiff argued that the disclosure statutes violate the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. EACRET ET UX v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fernandez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Local No. 290 v. Oregon Department of Environmental QualityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Oregon State Police Officers Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Lone Oak Racing v. Oregon Racing Com'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 48 v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Oregon AFSCME v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. ACLU of Oregon v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API