Oregon AFSCME v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendants Department of Administrative Services (DAS) and the Attorney General appeal a judgment granting declaratory relief to plaintiffs Oregon AFSCME and Ann Hennessy and intervenor Oregon Nurses Association (ONA) (plaintiffs). We determine that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the declaratory judgment proceeding and, accordingly, reverse and remand.
As an “accrued benefit,” the state provides employees with eight hours of “sick leave with pay” each month. In March 1995, Mark Haas, a reporter for KATU-TV, made a public records request to DAS. He sought to identify state…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Lone Oak Racing v. Oregon Racing Com'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Pfizer Inc. v. Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. SharpeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010