Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Eugene Pinkey
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 17, 1977No. 76-1254PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
Arthur Eugene Pinkey was charged in a four count indictment, tried to a jury and found guilty of using the United States mails to perpetrate a scheme to defraud and obtain money, all in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341.
Pinkey, who proceeded to defend the charges pro se, with the “stand-by” advice of a Public Defender at trial, does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Accordingly, we shall relate the factual setting as succinctly as possible.
Pinkey was incarcerated in the Colorado State Penitentiary when the charged offenses occurred. At trial the Government…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bias v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Norman L. Birl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Harlan L. Jacobsen v. Richard FillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.