Jordan v. Interurban Motor Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Shaw, J., at tbe March Term, 1920, of RANDOLPH. This is a civil action brought to recover damages for personal injuries of the fem There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, J.,
after stating the case: 1. There was evidence tending to sustain the cause of action, as alleged in the complaint.
The first objection of the defendant is that the court permitted Dr. Jackson, an expert witness, to testify as to the condition of two of the feme plaintiff’s ribs, which he said had been concaved by the blow she received in the accident. The feme plaintiff testified that she was sore-on that side of her body, and, upon examination, the doctor discovered that the ribs were in a concaved condition. The defendant complains that the plaintiff had not first proven that this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Fleming v. Tarboro Knitting MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Smith v. Atlantic & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Martin v. P. H. Hanes Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Cashatt v. Asheville Seed Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953