Legal Opinion

Cashatt v. Asheville Seed Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

The judge of the county court charged the jury as follows: “The court charges you that the negligence of the plaintiff, if there was such, would not bar his recovery unless it directly and proximately contributed to his injury; his contribution to his own injury would not prevent recovery by him if there was negligence on the part of the defendant which when compared with that of the plaintiff was the proximate cause of the injury sustained.”

After the jury had deliberated for sometime they returned for further instruction. The record shows the following: Another juror said to the court that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Williams v. Kinston Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Jordan v. Interurban Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API