Nidec Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTY TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP, INC.’S MOTION TO QUASH; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO QUASH
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In connection with the above-referenced case, Plaintiff Nidec Corporation served, on May 2, 2007, a subpoena on a nonparty by the name of Texas Pacific Group, Inc. (“TPGI”). Currently pending before the Court are TPGI’s motion to quash the subpoena, see Docket No. 677, and Defendants’ motion to quash the subpoena. See Docket Nos. 672, 693. TPGI has also filed a motion to change time, which is now moot. See Docket No. 681.
Having…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- United States v. BergonziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Sealed Air Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Soto v. Castlerock Farming & Transport, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Selby v. O'DeaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Selby v. O'DeaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Dawe v. Corrections USADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.