Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Heckman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.

Appellant, the Commonwealth, appeals from the January 22, 2010 Order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County which granted Appellee Craig Matthew Heckman’s motion for habeas corpus and dismissed his criminal charges for failure to comply with registration requirements for sexual offenders1 pursuant to Megan’s Law.2 For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this decision.

The facts of this case are as follows:

In a previous case, [Appellee] was convicted of unlawful contact with a minor, sentenced to a period of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. WilgusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. WilgusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. RubySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HilliardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Com. v. Cruz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Curry, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Donahue, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Pleskonko, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API