Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilgus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

CLELAND, J.:

¶ 1 We are called on to decide whether the Legislature, in requiring a Megan’s Law offender to register his “residence,” included within the requirement the circumstances of this case in which the defendant is a homeless and transient person.

¶ 2 The defendant William Howard Wil-gus (Wilgus) was released from prison and, after being turned away from various housing programs, lived on the streets of downtown Harrisburg for 30 days before being arrested for not registering his “residence” as required by Megan’s Law. He was convicted in a non-jury trial, but the trial judge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Sternlicht v. SternlichtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. NelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Zimmerman v. Harrisburg Fudd I, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. State of Alabama v. Thornal Lee Adams.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. WilgusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In the Interest of A.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API