Legal Opinion

People v. Hohertz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 30, 1995No. 95SA194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This lawyer discipline proceeding comes to us on a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel. C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the stipulation and recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for three months, with reinstatement contingent on the satisfaction of certain requirements, including that the respondent undergo reinstatement proceedings pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.22(b)-(d), and that he pay costs. We accept the stipulation and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. C De BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BabinskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. People v. HohertzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. HOHERTZ v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API