Legal Opinion

People v. Hohertz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 28, 1996No. 96SA308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The assistant disciplinary counsel and the respondent, Robert Melvin Hohertz, executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties agreed in the conditional admission to the imposition of suspension from the practice of law in the range of two to three years. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, with the recommendation that the respondent be suspended for three years. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SilvolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. HohertzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SegalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. HOHERTZ v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API