Legal Opinion

People v. C De Baca

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1993No. 93SA57PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing board in this attorney discipline case recommended that the respondent 1 be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days, be required to petition for reinstatement, and be assessed costs. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the board’s findings and recommendation. The respondent has not excepted to the panel’s action, except for the requirement that he petition for reinstatement. We accept the panel’s recommendation.

I

Based upon the testimony of the witnesses, including that of the respondent himself, and after considering the exhibits introduced…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. MayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. SouthernSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re C De BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. People v. C De BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. HohertzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. BabinskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API