Legal Opinion

President Reagan's Ability to Receive Retirement Benefits From the State of California

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided June 23, 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

President Reagan’s Ability to Receive Retirement Benefits from the State of California Payment to President Reagan of the state retirement benefits to which he is entitled is not intended to subject him to improper influence, nor would it have any such effect, and therefore his receipt of such benefits would not violate the Presidential Emoluments Clause. U.S. Const., Art. II, § 1, cl. 7. Even if the Presidential Emoluments Clause were interpreted strictly on the basis of the dictionary definition of the term “emolument,” it would not prohibit President Reagan's receipt of state retirement…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API