Legal Opinion

Herrin Transp. Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 3257PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENBERRY, Chief Judge.

In this suit, plaintiffs seek to vacate and set aside'an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission dated September 27, 1951, denying the application of the plaintiffs to transfer to Herrin Transportation Co. Inc., Robert T. Herrin party in control, certificates of public convenience and necessity theretofore issued to Mobile Express, Inc., in I. C. C. Docket Numbers MC-29906 and MC-29906-Sub. No. 1, authorizing said corporation to operate as an interstate common carrier by motor vehicle. The application of plaintiffs was filed on April 1, 1949, under Section 5 of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. ILLINOIS CENT. & C. RR v. Inter. Com. Comm.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arrow Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  2. M. & M. TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
  3. M. & M. TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
  4. Sites Freightlines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API