Legal Opinion

Davis v. United Service Automobile Ass'n.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1990No. D009954PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

United Services Automobile Association (USAA) appeals a judgment in favor of Richard and Yvonne Davis. On appeal, USAA contends the court erred in finding the loss was covered under the original policy and that exclusions in later policies did not apply because USAA had failed to adequately notify the Davises of the new exclusions. We affirm.

Facts

USAA insured the Davis home with an all-risk policy. From January 3, 1978, to January 3, 1984, the “HO-3 policy” form was in effect. That policy specifically excluded loss “caused by, resulting from, contributed to or aggravated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Leff v. GunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Strubble v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Opsal v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Von Der LiethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. North River Insurance v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Tepe v. Rocky Mountain Hospital & Medical ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Malcom v. Farmers New World Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API