Legal Opinion

North River Insurance v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1995No. 9414SC175PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

This appeal is interlocutory because the trial court’s summary judgment did not determine the entire controversy between the parties. Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E.2d 377, reh’g denied, 232 N.C. 744, 59 S.E.2d 429 (1950). But, this interlocutory appeal is properly considered on appeal since the trial judge certified the order for appeal pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1 , Rule 54(b) (1990), which states “if there has been a final disposition as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties in a case, the trial judge may certify that there is no just…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Mauney v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Ellis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Bartlett Milling Co., LP v. Walnut Grove Auction and Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Chicora Country Club, Inc. v. Town of ErwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Members Interior Construction, Inc. v. Leader Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API