Legal Opinion

Erskine Heirs v. Gardiner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 2, 1928No. 29008PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

We annex a rough sketch of the lands involved in this controversy. It is not drawn to scale; to be so, the depth of the land from east to west should be double the front thereof from north to south. But, as it is, it is sufficiently clear for the purposes of the controversy. The particular matter inirolved is the title to tract I-I, being the western or, rear 40 acres of the lower or southernmost 9 arpents’ frontage on the river.

I

Plaintiffs, 10 in number, are the sole heirs of William Erskine and Ernestine Erskine, his wife. They bring this suit to annul certain confirmations of title given…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reardon v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Gill v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. Erskine v. GardinerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Fernandez v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. John Bonura & Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Elston v. Parish Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. ShushanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Violet Trapping Co. v. GraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. Silbernagel v. HarrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Foster v. SpannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API