Legal Opinion

Erskine v. Gardiner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 5, 1926No. 27802PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

This is a partition suit in which an injunction is also prayed for. The petition alleges that the plaintiffs are co-owners in indivisión with the defendant and the unknown heirs of George Urquhart and Mrs. George Urquhart, both deceased, of a certain described tract of land in Plaque-mines parish, La.; that plaintiffs are not willing to remain as co-owners in indivisión; that the property is not divisible in kind; and that a partition by licitation should be ordered. It is also alleged that the defendant has depredated upon the property, removed some timber therefrom, and, unless restrained…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rives v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Gondran v. RostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. Boutté v. Executors of BouttéSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  5. J. Meyers & Co. v. BirotteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Com'rs of Port of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Erskine Heirs v. GardinerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. City of New Orleans and Robert E. Develle, Director of Finance of the City of New Orleans v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Chrysler Corporation v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  5. Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons PartnershipLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API