Legal Opinion
Stanton v. Southern Berkshire Regional School District
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 19, 1998No. Civil Action 96-30115-MAPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PONSOR, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs is hereby DENIED. If a reviewing court should determine on appeal that plaintiffs were entitled to attorney’s fees and costs, however, this court cal culates the amount to which plaintiffs would be entitled as $15,533.33 in fees and $548.00 in costs.
MEMORANDUM REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs challenged the Southern Berkshire Regional School District (“SBRSD”) election scheme under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ciulla v. RignyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- System Management, Inc. v. LoiselleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Martinez v. HodgsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Yankee Candle Co. v. Bridgewater Candle Co., LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Mountain Cable Co. v. ChoquetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999