Legal Opinion
Mountain Cable Co. v. Choquette
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 21, 1999No. Civ A 98-30027-MAPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S STATEMENTS, AND PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR FEES AND COSTS
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
These motions arise out of defendant’s unauthorized interception and distribution of plaintiffs cable services in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 553. Defendant admits violating the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Denise COUTIN, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. YOUNG & RUBICAM PUERTO RICO, INC., Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Instrument Corporation of Delaware at No. 98-1502 v. Nu-Tek Electronics & Manufacturing, Inc., at No. 98-1424Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- System Management, Inc. v. LoiselleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Charter Communications Entertainment I, LLC v. BurdulisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Aly v. Mohegan Council, Boy Scouts of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- General Instr. Corp v. NU-TEK Electr. & Mfg, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999