Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1993No. 1516-92, 1517-92PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

A jury found Appellant guilty of three counts of Aggravated Sexual Assault and one count of Burglary of a Habitation and assessed his punishment for each of the offenses at confinement for life and a $10,000 fine. The jury also made an affirmative finding of the use or exhibition of a deadly weapon. The Court of Appeals reversed Appellant’s conviction in Bishop v. State, 837 S.W.2d 431 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1992), and remanded the case to the trial court. The State brings this petition on three grounds for review challenging…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Plante v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Arcila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Collazo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Crawley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Johnston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Page v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Swarb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API