Collazo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
A jury found the appellant guilty of sexual abuse and assessed a punishment of confinement for twelve years. The question presented is whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of an extraneous offense. Such questions involve principles of law which were stated well in Murphy v. State, 587 S.W.2d 718, 721-722 (Tex.Cr.App.1979) (footnotes omitted) (emphases omitted):
“It is an established general rule of evidence that proof of similar happenings, extraneous transactions or prior specific acts of misconduct committed by a party is irrelevant to the contested…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ruiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Roberson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.