Lockwood v. Lord
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Plaintiffs, Adam Lockwood and his parents, appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, entered by the court for defendant Dr. Lord, after a jury verdict for plaintiffs. We reverse. Pursuant to V.R.C.E 50(c), the trial court conditionally ordered a new trial if the judgment notwithstanding the verdict were reversed. We conclude that the grant of a new trial on the basis of the weight of the evidence was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. Defendant cross-appeals, claiming that the jury instructions were improper and that the damages were unsubstantiated and excessive. We find…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Samuel Simblest v. Joseph MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Weeks v. BurnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- South Burlington School District v. Calcagni-Frazier-Zajchowski Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- State v. GokeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Monahan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Smith v. ParrottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Maguire v. GorrusoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- B & F LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. SteinfeldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.