Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. Lord

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 16, 1994No. 93-413PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Plaintiffs, Adam Lockwood and his parents, appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, entered by the court for defendant Dr. Lord, after a jury verdict for plaintiffs. We reverse. Pursuant to V.R.C.E 50(c), the trial court conditionally ordered a new trial if the judgment notwithstanding the verdict were reversed. We conclude that the grant of a new trial on the basis of the weight of the evidence was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. Defendant cross-appeals, claiming that the jury instructions were improper and that the damages were unsubstantiated and excessive. We find…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Samuel Simblest v. Joseph MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Weeks v. BurnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. South Burlington School District v. Calcagni-Frazier-Zajchowski Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. State v. GokeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Monahan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Smith v. ParrottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. Maguire v. GorrusoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. B & F LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. SteinfeldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API