Legal Opinion

Martin v. Schuermeyer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1912No. 1428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by W. F. Schuermeyer against T. H. Martin, the City of Muskogee, a city of the first class of Oklahoma, Edward C. Alley, L. E. Prall, W. F. Shewey, Henry Vogel, and J. PI. Klick. Judgment for plaintiff against the'defendants T. H. Martin, Edward C. Alley, L. E. Prall, W. F. Shewey, Henry Vogel, and J. H. Klick, and in favor of the defendant the City of Muskogee, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This was a suit by W. H. Schuermeyer against the city of Muskogee, T. H. Martin, E. C. Alley, L. E. Prall, W. F. Shewey, Plenry Vogel, and J. H. Klick to recover for legal service rendered as attorney, and for expenses incurred in the cases of the state of Oklahoma ex rel. Attorney General v. PI. M. Chestnutt, the same plaintiff against Ledbetter, and the same plaintiff against Walrond. The plaintiff testified in the case, and at the close of his testimony the defendant city of Muskogee demurred to the evidence, and the demurrer was sustained. The court then instructed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ogden v. RaymondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  2. Ware, Murphy & Co. v. Morgan & DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Sanborn v. NealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  4. Humphrey v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. McCurdy v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co. v. HammSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Hupe v. SommerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Opinion No. 73-161 (1973) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API