Legal Opinion

Opinion No. 73-161 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided June 26, 1973Published

1Opinion of the Court

CITY COUNCILMAN — VOTING

A city councilman may not be held liable for damages based upon the way in which he votes upon a particular matter in the absence of fraud or corruption, or unless he acts without authority of law. 11 O.S. 676 [11-676] (1971). A writ of mandamus is not available as a remedy to compel a city councilman to perform any particular action unless the act required of the city councilman is one of a purely ministerial nature which is imposed upon him by law and which does not require the exercise of any discretion upon his part. The Attorney General is in receipt of your…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Bowles v. Neely, MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Baxley v. City of FrederickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Oklahoma City v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Hoffman v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API