Legal Opinion

Johnson Et Ux. v. Headrick Et Ux.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 17, 1948PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGfOODMAN, J.

Appellees, complainants below, sought by their original bill to establish an implied reservation of easement or right of way over the property of the appellants. They, in substance, averred that by deed dated November 20, 1934, of record in Deed Book 573 at Page 345 of the Register’s Office of Knox County, Tennessee, they acquired title to Lots Nos. 2 and 3 in Block “Ei” of Forrest Park Addition in Knoxville, Tennessee, said lots containing ten acres more or less; that there was a residence located on said property at the time of purchase accessible to Sharp Avenue, now Crozier Street, by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larue v. Greene County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bowles v. ChapmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Harris v. Gray Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Rightsell v. HaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Powell v. RileyTennessee Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cellco Partnership v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Charlie Lee Ingram v. Rebecca and Randy WassonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  3. Newman v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Fowler v. WilbanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Line v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API