Legal Opinion

Powell v. Riley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM HAWKINS. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Rogersville. C. J. St: John, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

In the partition of the lands of the estate of their father, made by the county court in 1881, certain land on the Holston river was allotted to the complainant, Mary E., wife 'of E. D. Powell, and a portion of the same tract immediately below on the river was allotted to the defendant, A. K. Riley. The father during his life had dug and kept open a large ditch through the land constituting the two allotments, parallel to the river, for the purpose of draining the land, which was wet and marshy, and of carrying off the water coming from some springs on the hills above. The defendant’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. . AyraultNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Martin v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1804
  3. Burwell v. HobsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1855

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson Et Ux. v. Headrick Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Lively v. NoeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  3. Harris v. Gray Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Allison v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  5. Barge v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API