Legal Opinion

Kotzman v. Papish

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1950No. 37,903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

Plaintiff brought this action May 12, 1948, for a decree that she is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in a described residence property in the city of Frontenac and for partition of the property. The trial court heard the evidence, found all issues in favor of the plaintiff, and rendered judgment accordingly. Defendants have appealed and rely upon our statute of limitations (G. S. 1935, 60-306, ¶¶ 2 and 3) and upon G. S. 1935, 67-401 of our statute of trusts.

The facts shown by the record, which are not controverted, may be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Malone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Axe v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Hutto v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Herthel v. BarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doll v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API