Kotzman v. Papish
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, C. J.:
Plaintiff brought this action May 12, 1948, for a decree that she is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in a described residence property in the city of Frontenac and for partition of the property. The trial court heard the evidence, found all issues in favor of the plaintiff, and rendered judgment accordingly. Defendants have appealed and rely upon our statute of limitations (G. S. 1935, 60-306, ¶¶ 2 and 3) and upon G. S. 1935, 67-401 of our statute of trusts.
The facts shown by the record, which are not controverted, may be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Malone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Axe v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Hutto v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Herthel v. BarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doll v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007