Legal Opinion

Hoagland v. Van Etten

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Pleard below before Wakeley, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. On the trial of the cause the court rendered a decree as follows:

“This cause came on to be heard heretofore during this *293term, and 'both parties appearing by counsel, and a jury. being in open court waived, the case was tried to the court, and after the introduction of the evidence on behalf of the parties and argument of counsel, the same was taken under advisement, and upon consideration of all the pleadings and evidence in the case and arguments of counsel, the court finds on the issues joined in favor of the plaintiff that there is due the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoagland v. Van EttenNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hoagland v. Van EttenNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Grinnell, Minturn & Co. v. SchmidtThe Superior Court of New York City · 1850
  4. Hollenbeck v. Van ValkenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Archer v. MusickNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. McCook Irrigation & Water Power Co. v. CrewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Western Cornice & Manufacturing Works v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Citizens National Bank v. GreggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API